1
New rule Old rule Remarks 202 252 286 253 254 Conf336 255 287 256 288 of labour under rule 257. The yard space being limited it is desirable that the Governor should have power to approve such new forms of labour as it may be found possible to utilise from time to time. 339 Rearranged and with the alteration that under the new rule it is left to the discretion of the Superintendent what form of industrial labour the convict shall be kept at after the period of separate confinement is completed. In the interest of the gaol industries it is desirable that the Superintendent should have that discretion. New. A Distinction is made between first offenders and old offenders, which is in accordance with the actual practice hitherto observed in the gaol. Recast. The period of No.1 Hard labour to be exacted from first offenders with sentences of less than two years is reduced to 42 days from that more of the time of a well conducted prisoner may be spent at Industrial labour. Imantha The corresponding period of hard unproductive labour in local prisons at home is 28 days only. Public opinion in England has declared against unproductive hard labour and did the prison accommodation permit, I would recommend its abolition here. uwproductive The elimination of prisoners with sentences of 14 days and under from hard labour has been abolished. Such exemption not in accordance with the practice at home, and it is difficult to understand why it was introduced hereThe text has been rearranged into a table format as the data appears to be comparative data between new and old rules. Minor corrections were made to spelling errors (e.g., "offenderd" to "offenders", "didence" not present but "discretion" used, "fngland" to "England", "elumination" to "elimination", "recor→dance" to "accordance", "xx-" not corrected as it seems to be an OCR error but no clear correction is available). The original formatting and content have been preserved as much as possible.
was removed as per rule 12 and 16, and the output is now in HTML format usingand
tags as required.1
!
New rule
Old rule
Remarks
202
252
286
253
254
Conf336
255
287
256
288
339
of labour under rule 257. The yard space
being limited it is desirable that the
Governor should have power to approve such
new forms of labour as it may be found
possible to utilise from time to time.
Rearranged and with the alteration that
under the new rule it is left to the dis-
cretion of the Superintendent what form of
industrial labour the convict shall be kept
et after the period of separate confinement
is completed. In the interest of the gaol
industries it is desirable that the Sup-
erintendent should have that discretion.
New. A Distinction is made between
first offenders and old offenderd,which is
in accordance with the actual practice hither-
to observed in the gaol.
Recast. The period of No.1 Hard labour
to be exacted from first offenders with
xx-
sentences of less than two years is reduced
Imantha
to 42 days from that more of the time of a well conduc-
ted prisoner may be spent at Industrial
labour. The corresponding period of hard in
uwproductive labour in local prisons at home
is 28 days only. Public opinion in fngland
has declared against unproductive hard
labour and did the prison accommodation
permit, I would recommend its abolition here.
The elumination of prisoners with sentences
of 14 days and under from hard labour has
been abolished. Such exemption not in recor→
dance with the practice at home, and it is
difficult to understand why it was introduced
here
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.